|
Concepts of Rurality in Modern Education: the Formulation of a Research Problem
DOI: 10.23951/2782-2575-2024-4-71-89
As the modern village evolves, with shifts in lifestyle, identity, daily practices, and a growing diversification of the rural economy, it becomes necessary to broaden the traditional range of career options for rural students. An analysis of rural school development programs shows that, in most cases, the strategic educational objectives are hardly linked to the economic and sociocultural characteristics of the areas in which they are located. A task allocation that correlates with rural identity and the local sociocultural code is extremely rare. If we look at the strategies for the vocational self-determination of rural students, generally oriented towards the agricultural sector, and the mechanisms for their implementation, we see that they are stereotypical and have a certain formalism. Perhaps for this very reason, the potential of a rural school is not really considered by those responsible as a factor and resource for the socio economic development of the territory. In this context, the goal setting of rural schools concerning the self determined life of students, which is important for rural identity and the specificities of the territories in which they are located, is becoming increasingly important. In this case, the rural school can be considered a key element of the infrastructure that allows the diffusion and rooting of the rural code in the life and professional paths of rural youth. The study aims to pose a research problem on the necessity of a modern concept of rurality within the framework of rural school pedagogy as an independent branch of pedagogical science. Our scientific research will refer to our previously formed understanding of rural school as “a complexly organized educational system capable of self-organization and self-regulation under the conditions of a hybrid (real/virtual) ontology... Its basic characteristics are multifunctionality, openness, continuity, adaptability to the local culture of a given rural society, and convergence.” The existing concepts of rurality, which are based on a sociological approach, are interdisciplinary. The basic ideas about the network society are reflected in the scientific approaches used for the theoretical identification of the village and the conceptualization of rurality in the post-industrial era. In our view, the most important approaches are the sociocultural, spatial, and systemic approaches. The sociocultural approach makes it possible to expand the boundaries of research by considering a rural school in a system of cultural coordinates (meanings, values, value orientations, principles) that ensures social connections and at the center of which is the active human being (homo activus), a multidimensional bio-socio-cultural being. Spatial and systemic approaches are needed in research as complementary approaches. The spatial approach aims to explain the village’s situation in the context of globalization and urbanization of the modern world and the implementation of Russian state programs for the economic development of territories. From a theoretical point of view, one can rely on understanding the village as a totality of changing physical and social spaces. A systematic approach helps to maintain the integrity and structure of the study. The peculiarities of the new rurality and its characteristics can be considered in developing rural-oriented strategies for the self-determined lives of students in rural schools. Education that incorporates the sociocultural code by strengthening rurality should aim to develop creativity, critical thinking, communication skills, and the ability to work together. This is fundamental for future professionals who can reshape the rural economy by considering market demands.
Ключевые слова: concept, rural-oriented strategies, self-determined life, students, rural schools
Библиография:
1. Plotichkina N.V. Sel’skaya identichnost’ kak “identichnost’ s mestom” [Rural identity as “identity with place”]. Sborniki konferentsiy NIC Sotsiosfera – Conference proceedings of the Scientific Research Center Sociosphere. 2019;34:34-38 (in Russian).
2. Tsirul’nikov A.M. Sotsiokul’turnyy podkhod k razvitiyu obrazovaniya v sel’skikh territoriyakh [Sociocultural approach to the development of education in rural areas]. Pedagogika sel’skoy shkoly – Pedagogy of rural school. 2022;2(12):5-32 (in Russian).
3. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel’stva Rossii ot 02 fevralya 2015 g. [Order of the Government of Russia dated February 2, 2015] (in Russian). URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70761426/#101
4. Ofitsial’nyy sayt gosudarstvennoy programmy “Kompleksnoe razvitie sel’skikh territoriy” [Official website of the state program “Integrated development of rural areas”] (in Russian). URL: https://крст.рф/#fiz_licam
5. Vedomstvenniy proekt “Tsifrovoe sel’skoe hozyaystvo” [Departmental project “Digital agriculture"]. Moscow, FGBNU “Rosinformagrotekh” Publ., 2019:48 p. (in Russian).
6. Postanovlenie Pravitel’stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 25 avgusta 2017 g. No. 996 “Ob utverzhdenii Federal’noy nauchno-tekhnicheskoy programmy razvitiya sel’skogo hozyaystva na 2017–2030 gody” [On approval of the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Agriculture for 2017–2030] (in Russian). URL: https://mcx.gov.ru/upload/iblock/1e1/qbvh1oqz9rptbwbjxz3qodtfdgn97a14.pdf.
7. Sherayzina R.M., Aleksandrova M.V., Eflova Z.B. Sel’skaya shkola i sel’skiy uchitel’: produktivnye rossiyskie i zarubezhnye praktiki [Rural school and rural teacher: productive Russian and foreign practices]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2021;466;190–201 (in Russian).
8. Gorbushov A.A. Issledovaniya sel’skoy shkoly Rossii v NEB “eLIBRARY.RU” i predstavlenie sotsiokul’turnogo prostranstva sel’skoy shkoly v virtual’noy srede, v tom chisle v sotsial’nykh setyakh [Research of rural schools in Russia in the NEL “eLIBRARY.RU” and presentation of the sociocultural space of rural schools in a virtual environment, including social networks]. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya – Problems of modern education. 2022;5:116-123 (in Russian).
9. Sartakova E.E., Okushova G.A., Eretnova E.P. Sel’skaya shkola v usloviyakh sociokul’turnoy modernizatsii obrazovaniya: postneklassicheskie osnovaniya dlya kontseptualizatsii [Rural school in the context of sociocultural modernization of education: post-non-classical grounds for conceptualization]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal. 2022;481:206-214 (in Russian).
10. Semenenko I.S. Sel’skoe mestnoe soobshchestvo v fokuse politiki razvitiya: nauchnyy diskurs i evropeyskie politicheskie realii [Rural Local Community in Focus of Development Policy: Scientific Discourse and European Political Realities]. Yuzhno-rossiyskiy zhurnal social’nykh nauk – South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences. 2019;3:6-27 (in Russian).
11. Lapin N.I. Puti Rossii: sotsiokul’turnye transformatsii [Russia’s Paths: Sociocultural Transformations]. Moscow, Institut filosofii RAN Publ., 2000, 194 p. (in Russian).
12. Artamonova T.A. Sotsiokul’turnyy potentscial sel’skogo obraza zhizni s pozitsii novykh tsivilizatsionnykh otnosheniy: vzglyad iz Sibiri [Sociocultural potential of rural lifestyle from the standpoint of new civilizational relations: a view from Siberia]. Idei i idealy – Ideas and ideals. 2022;3-2:468-485 (in Russian).
13. Evdokimova T.G. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovaniya izucheniya tsennostnykh orientaciy [Theoretical and methodological foundations for studying value orientations]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya “Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Iskusstvovedenie” – Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series “Philosophy. Sociology. Art Criticism” 2018;1(11):65-75 (in Russian).
14. Zav’yalova A.N. Sotsiokul’turniy kod kak sistemoobrazuyushchiy faktor strukturirovaniya i funktsionirovaniya goroda [Sociocultural code as a system-forming factor in the structuring and functioning of the city]. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal – International research journal. 2014;9(28):139-140 (in Russian).
15. Savitskiy V.M. Kul’turnye kody: sushchnost’, sostav i funktsionirovanie v protsesse obshcheniya [Cultural codes: essence, composition and functioning in the process of communication]. Diskurs professional’noy kommunikatsii – Discourse of professional communication. 2019;4(1):68-77 (in Russian).
16. Nefedova T.G., Pokrovskiy N.E., Treyvish A.I. Urbanizatsiya, dezurbanizatsiya i sel’sko-gorodskie soobshchestva v usloviyakh rosta gorizontal’noy mobil’nosti naseleniya [Urbanization, deurbanization and rural-urban communities in the context of increasing horizontal population mobility]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – Sociological research. 2015;12:60-69 (in Russian).
17. Nefedova T.G., Mkrtchyan N.V. Migratsiya sel’skogo naseleniya i dinamika sel’skokhozyaystvennoy zanyatosti v regionakh Rossii [Migration of rural population and dynamics of agricultural employment in the regions of Russia]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta – Bulletin of Moscow University. 2017;5(5):58-67 (in Russian).
18. Nefedova T.G. Dvadtsat’ pyat’ let postsovetskomu sel’skomu khozyaystvu Rossii: geograficheskie tendentsii i protivorechiya [Twenty-five years of post-Soviet agriculture in Russia: geographic trends and contradictions]. Izvestiya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk – News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2017;5:8-19 (in Russian).
19. Podgorskaya S.V., Miroshnichenko T.A., Bakhmatova G.A. Sovremennye aspekty diversifikatsii sel’skoy ekonomiki v usloviyakh tsivilizatsionnykh transformaciy [Modern aspects of diversification of rural economy in the context of civilizational transformations]. Rostov on Don, 2021:112 p. (in Russian).
20. Stepin V.S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya [Classics, non-classics, post-non-classics: criteria for distinction]. In: Stepin V.S. (ed.) Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura [Post-non-classical: philosophy, science, culture.]. Saint Petersburg, Mir Publ., 2009:249-295 (in Russian).
21. Malkova I.Yu. Kontseptsiya i praktika organizatsii obrazovatel’nogo proektirovaniya v innovacionnoy shkole [The concept and practice of organizing educational design in an innovative school]. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni doktora pedagogicheskikh nauk [Abstract of a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences]. Tomsk, 2008:42 p. (in Russian).
22. Toshchenko Zh.T. Smysly zhiznennogo mira sel’skikh zhiteley [Meanings of the life world of rural residents]. In: Toshchenko Zh.T. (ed.) Smysly sel’skoy zhizni (Opyt sociologicheskogo analiza) [Meanings of rural life (Experience of sociological analysis)]. Moscow, Centr social’nogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga Publ., 2016:368 p. (in Russian).
23. Pichuzhkin N.A. “Pis’ma” Aleksandra Engel’gardta (k 150-letiyu “12 pisem iz derevni”) [“Letters” by Alexander Engelhardt (on the 150th anniversary of “12 Letters from the Village”)]. Nauka bez granits – Science without borders. 2021;1(53):14-19 (in Russian).
24. Ryvkina R.V. Obraz zhizni sel’skogo naseleniya: metodologiya, metodika i rezul’taty izucheniya sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh aspektov zhiznedeyatel’nosti na primere Zapadnoy Sibiri [Lifestyle of the rural population: methodology, methods and results of studying the socio-economic aspects of life using the example of Western Siberia]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1979:352 p. (in Russian).
25. Mel’nikova E.A. Derevnya v gorodskikh proektsiyakh sovremennykh rossiyan [The village in the urban projections of modern Russians]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie – Ethnographic Review. 2020;6:5-11 (in Russian).
26. Novaya “sel’skost’” v sovremennoy Rossii. Ofitsial’niy sayt nauchnogo issledovaniya antropologov [New “rurality” in modern Russia] (in Russian). URL: http://project1092903.tilda.ws/#rec85745372
27. Kupriyanov P.S., Savina N.A. Sovremenniy muzey russkoy derevni: proizvodstvo sel’skosti byvshimi gorozhanami [Contemporary Museum of the Russian Village: Production of Rurality by Former City-Dwellers]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie – Ethnographic Review. 2020;6:12-30 (in Russian).
28. Rannikko P., Varis E., Piipponen M. Koyvusel’ga. Sotsial’naya transformatsiya lesozagotovitel’nogo poselka v rossiyskoj Karelii [Social Transformation of a Logging Village in Russian Karelia]. Studia Humanitatis Borealis. 2016;2:32-47(in Russian).
29. Brednikova O. Derevnya umerla? Da zdravstvuet derevnya! [Is the village dead? Long live the village!]. In: Brednikova O., Bogdanovich E. (eds) Vdali ot gorodov. Zhizn’ postsovetskoy derevni [Far from the cities. Life in a post-Soviet village]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteiya Publ., 2013. 55 p. (in Russian).
( 446.36 kB ) 
( 438.63 kB )
Выпуск: 4, 2024
Серия выпуска: Issue 4
Рубрика: PEDAGOGY
Страницы: 71 — 89
Скачиваний: 8