|
Foundations of pedagogy: discipline or school ethos?
DOI: 10.23951/2782-2575-2025-4-26-42
This article examines a long-standing tension in the history of pedagogy arising from two competing conceptions of education and its organization: mechanistic and humanistic. The familiar opposition between natural-scientific and humanistic paradigms is revisited to encourage reflection on the legacy of classical didactics. We analyze the historical conditions under which didactics emerged, when scientific explanation relied on mechanics and mathematics. These mathematical and mechanistic modes of understanding shaped J. Comenius’s design of a didactic system. From the broader rationalist tradition, we highlight G. Leibniz as an emblematic case of the claim that a mathematical calculus can organize reality. The resulting “mechanical order” and numeration informed the structuring of time and space in schools and underpinned school discipline. A synoptic account of disciplinary education is provided with reference to M. Foucault. The contrast between disciplinary pedagogy and humanistic pedagogy is framed as “mechanism vs. organism,” “mechanical aggregate vs. organic system,” drawing on arguments by the Russian philosopher and psychologist A. Arsenyev. We then consider school designs that treat the school as an organic system, using the cases of Moscow Experimental School No. 91 and the Univers School in Krasnoyarsk. To explain how education is organized in these schools, we use A. Tubelsky’s concept of the school’s uklad – rendered here as school ethos – and relates it to what English-language scholarship terms the hidden curriculum, that is, the formative influence of the school environment and informal life on students’ worldviews. The article concludes with a description of the project by I. Frumin and B. Elkonin implemented at Univers, titled the “School of Growing Up.” Its core idea is to differentiate age-bound and all-age spaces within the school. Agebounded space is organized around staged growing up; age features are reflected in the regulation of classes and in the architecture and design of learning spaces. All-age space is a shared arena for inter-age communication and encounter.
Keywords: didactics; discipline; determinism; mechanism; organism; freedom; school ethos (uklad); hidden curriculum; personhood
References:
1. Vеšкеré Spisy Jana Amosa Komenského. Sv. IV v. Brno, 1913. 324 p. (Russ. ed.: Komenskii Ya.A. Velikaya didaktika. T. 1. [Great Didactics. Vol. 1.] Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe Uchebno-pedagogicheskoe izdatel’stvo Narkomprosa RSFSR Publ., 1939. 318 p.).
2. Leont’ev A.A. Pedagogicheskoe obshchenie. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. [Pedagogical Communication. 2nd ed., revised and enlarged]. Moscow, Nal’chik, Izd. tsentr “El’-Fa” Publ., 1996. 93 p. (in Russian).
3. Leibniz G.V. Istoriya idei universal’noi kharakteristiki [History of the idea of a universal characteristic]. In: Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 3 [Works in four volumes. Vol. 3]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1984. Pp. 412–417 (in Russian).
4. Leibniz G.V. Ob universal’noi nauke, ili filosofskom ischislenii [On Universal Science, or Philosophical Calculus]. In: Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 3 [Works in four volumes. Vol. 3]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1984. Pp. 494–500 (in Russian).
5. Foucault M. Naissance de la clinique: une archéologie du regard médical. Presses universitaires de France, Paris, 1963, 398 p. (Russ. ed.: Fuko M. Rozhdenie kliniki: Arkheologya vrachebnogo vzglyada [The Birth of a Clinic: Archaeology from a Medical Perspective]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 1998. 422 p.).
6. Foucault M. Surveiler et punir. Naissance de la prison. Edition GALIMARD 1975, Paris, 398 p. (Russ. ed.: Fuko M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’. Rozhdenie tyur’my [Discipline and Punish. The Birth of Prison]. Moscow, Muzei sovremennogo iskusstva “Garazh” Publ., 2022. 416 p.).
7. Savin M.V. Istoriko-pedagogicheskie vozzreniya Mishelya Fuko. [Historical and Pedagogical Views of Michel Foucault]. Istoriko-pedagogicheskii zhurnal – Historical and Pedagogical Journal. 2012, no 3, pp. 102–14 (in Russian).
8. Gal’perin P.YA. Vvedenie v psikhologiyu: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. 2-e izd. [Introduction to Psychology: A Textbook for Universities. 2nd ed.]. Moscow, Knizhnyi dom “Universitet” Publ., 2000. 336 p. (in Russian).
9. Nuttin J. Motivation, Planning, and Action: a relational Theory of Behavior Dynamics. Leuven University Press; Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Leuven,1984. Future Time Perspective and Motivation. Leuven University Press; Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Leuven, 1985. (Russ. ed.: Nyutten Zh. Motivatsiya, deistvie i perspektiva budushchego [Motivation, Action, and future Perspective]. .Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2004. 608 p.).
10. Tolstykh N.N. Razvitie vremennoi perspektivy lichnosti: kul’turno-istoricheskii podkhod: avtoreferat dissertatsii dok. psikhol. nauk [Development of the temporal perspective of the individual: a cultural-historical approach. Abstract of the dis. doct. of psychol. sci.]. Moscow, 2010. 54 p. (in Russian).
11. Marks K. Ekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 goda [Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844]. In: K. Marks i F. Engel’s. Sochineniya. Izdanie vtoroe. T. 42 [K. Marx and F. Engels. Works. Second edition. V. 42]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury Publ., 1974. Pp. 41–51 (in Russian).
12. Il’enkov E.V. V kakom prostranstve sushchestvuet lichnost’? [In what space does the personality exist?]. In: S chego nachinaetsya lichnost’ [Where does the Personality begin]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1984. Pp. 344–358 (in Russian).
13. Nartova-Bochaver S. K. Psikhologicheskoe prostranstvo lichnosti [Psychological space of Personality]. Moscow, Prometei Publ., 2005. 312 p. (in Russian).
14. Arsen’ev A.S. Logika organicheskikh sistem i psikhologiya. Filosofskie tezisy s psikhologicheskim kommentariem [Logic of organic systems and psychology. Philosophical theses with psychological commentary]. Razvitie lichnosti – Development of personality. 2013. no 2, pp. 84– 09 (in Russian).
15. Komenskii Ya.A. Vseobshchii sovet ob ispravlenii del chelovecheskikh [General Council on the Correction of Human Affairs]. URL: https://roerich-lib.ru/komenskij/6577-vseobshchij-sovet-ob-ispravlenii-del-chelovecheskikh?ysclid=mcvrw1eusz681022439 (accessed 16 July 2025) (in Russian).
16. Leibniz G.V. Vil’gel’ma Patsidiya Leibniza Avrora, ili nachala vseobshchei nauki, iskhodyashchie ot Bozhestvennogo sveta na blago chelovecheskogo schast’ya [Wilhelm Pacidius Leibniz Aurora, or the principles of universal science emanating from the Divine light for the benefit of human happiness]. In: Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 3 [Works in four volumes. Vol. 3]. Moscow, Mysl’, 1984. Pp. 401–403 (in Russian).
17. Leibnits V.G. Novye opyty o chelovecheskom razumenii avtora sistemy predustanovlennoi garmonii [New experiments on human understanding by the author of the system of pre-established harmony]. In: Sochineniya v 4 t. T.2. [Works in 4 volumes. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1983. Pp. 49–547 (in Russian).
18. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of pure reason]. Transl. from German by N. Lossky. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1994. 592 p. (in Russian).
19. Serikov V.V. Lichnostnyi podkhod v obrazovanii: kontseptsiya i tekhnologii [Personal approach in education: concept and technology]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 1994. 152 p. (in Russian).
20. Yamburg E.A. Sovremennyi vzglyad na vechnye problemy vospitaniya v kontekste pedagogicheskogo opyta XX veka [Modern view on the eternal problems of education in the context of the pedagogical experience of the XX century]. In: Izuchenie pedagogicheskoy real’nosti v kontekste kontseptsiy istoricheskogo i prakticheskogo proshlogo [Studying pedagogical reality in the context of concepts of historical and practical past]. Moscow, KURO Publ., 2025. Pp. 272–279 (in Russian).
21. Arsenyev A.S. Problema tseli v vospitanii i obrazovanii [The problem of the goal in upbringing and education]. In: Filosofsko-psikhologicheskie problemy razvitiya obrazovaniya [Philosophical and psychological problems of education development]. Moscow, INTOR Publ., 1994. Pp. 35–49 (in Russian).
22. Bibler V.S. Dialog kul’tur i shkola XXI veka [Dialogue of cultures and school of the 21st century]. In: Shkola dialoga kul'tur: Idei. Opyt. Problemy [School of dialogue of cultures: Ideas. Experience. Problems]. Kemerovo, “ALEF” Gumanitarnyi tsentr Publ., 1993. Pp. 3–22 (in Russian).
23. Mamardashvili M.K. Neobkhodimost’ sebya. Lektsii. Stat’i. Filosofskie zametki [The Necessity of Oneself. Lectures. Articles. Philosophical Notes]. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 1996. 432 p. (in Russian).
24. Petrovskii A.V., Slobodchikov V.I., Bim-Bad B.M., Gromyko Yu.V. Zadachi i napravleniya perestroiki pedagogicheskoi nauki [Tasks and Directions of Restructuring Pedagogical Science]. Voprosy psikhologii – Questions of Psychology. 1989, no. 2, pp. 14–19 (in Russian).
25. V serdtse 91 [In the Heart 91]. URL: https://www.calameo.com/read/00541115421df6767340b (accessed 20 July 2025) (in Russian).
26. Tubel’skii A.N. Uklad shkol’noi zhizni – skrytoe soderzhanie obrazovaniya [The Way of School Life – the Hidden Content of Education]. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2007, no. 4, pp. 177– 181 (in Russian).
27. Jackson F. Life in the Classroom, Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, 1968 (Russ. ed.: Dzhekson F. Zhizn’ v klasse in the Classroom. Moscow, Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki Publ., 2016. 248 p.).
28. Frumin I.D., El’konin B.D. Obrazovatel’noe prostranstvo kak prostranstvo razvitiya (“shkola vzrosleniya”) [Educational Space as a Development Space (“School of Growing Up”)]. Voprosy psikhologii – Questions of Psychology. 1992, no. 1, pp. 24–33 (in Russian).
29. Frumin I.D. Univers – shkola vzrosleniya [Universe – School of Growing Up]. Vesti obrazovaniya. 22.08.2018. URL: https://vogazeta.ru/articles/2018/8/22/quality_of_education/4366-univers__shkola_vzrosleniya?ysclid=mdbdrbxhmu20487778 (accessed 20 July 2025) (in Russian).
( 419.97 kB ) 
( 412.81 kB )
Issue: 4, 2025
Series of issue: Issue 4
Rubric: PEDAGOGY
Pages: 26 — 42
Downloads: 4